Common Misconceptions
In the course of 22 years' practice in the patent
profession, as both a patent examiner and patent attorney, I (as well as
most other attorneys), repeatedly encounter laypersons with major
misconceptions about patents, trademarks, and copyright. The following are
the most common ones I have found, together with a brief correction of each
to set the record straight.
Index
Short Descriptions of
Common Misconceptions
Risk of Loosing your Invention
Patent Examiners
Steal: CM: Patent examiners in the PTO
are on the lookout for good inventions to steal for their own use.
Fact: By law, patent examiners are not allowed to own any part of a
patent application....
Full Description
Index
Patent Applications
Open: CM: There is a danger in filing a patent application in the
PTO since others can come in, see, copy, or steal your invention.
Fact: By law, the PTO must preserve patent applications in secrecy and
in practice is very strict in this regard. Outsiders have no access to any
pending patent applications.
Index
Buy-up By Companies: CM:
Often large companies buy valuable inventions, such as the 100,000-mile tire
and the 100-mpg carburetor, at a pittance by defrauding the inventor or so
that they can continue to make enormous profits from their inefficient or
obsolescent products.
Fact: I have never heard of any successful instance of this and there
are valid reasons why it would not occur...
Full Description
Index
Old Date Of Conception: CM:
If you invented something twenty years ago, but kept it quiet and didn't get
around to filing a patent application yet, and you see that someone else has
recently received a patent on the same invention, you can still protect your
rights if you can prove your earlier date of invention.
Fact: In patent law, the diligent are rewarded and procrastinators tend
to lose out....
Full Description
Index
Getting A Patent
Everything Invented:
CM: It is more difficult to get a patent now because most of the good
ideas have already been invented.
Fact: The Commissioner of patents in 1898 was reported to have made this
same statement. After that came television, airplanes, cars, computers,
biotechnology, space travel, radio, etc....
Index
Transfer Inventorship:
CM: If your father (or another relative) invented something, but
didn't do anything with it, he can transfer his rights as an inventor to you
and you can apply for a patent on the invention in your name.
Fact: As stated in #1. above, only the true inventor can legally apply
for the patent...
Full Description
Index
Not In Use: CM: If you
have made an invention which neither you, nor any expert or executive in its
field, has ever heard of, you can be fairly sure that it is patentable.
Fact: It has been the experience of most patent professionals that
"experts" in any field are usually aware of only a small fraction of the
"prior art" in that field and that prior patents usually contain many times
more references than popular knowledge in the field.
Index
Patent Best: CM:
A patent is the best way to monopolize an invention:
Fact: Trade secret may sometimes be a better way of monopolizing your
invention.
Index
Known Invention: CM: If an
invention has been publicly known, but has never been patented, it's "up for
grabs" so that anyone who discovers it can now patent it.
Fact: According to the law, a patent can be awarded only to the first
person(s) to actually invent a new invention....
Full Description
Index
Copy Foreign Invention:
CM: One can copy a foreign invention and patent it in the US.
Fact: One must be the actual inventor to apply for a patent. Also,
once something is patented aborad, it it too late to patent it in the US.
Index
Patentability If No Inf:
CM: If manufacture of your invention will not infringe any prior patent,
you can get a patent on the invention.
Fact: Again a confusing of anticipation and infringement--infringement
considerations are irrelevant in determining patentability.
Index
Foreign Patents:
CM: Foreign patents and publications cannot block your patent
application, even if they show your invention.
Fact: Prior publication, from anywhere in the world, is valid prior art
against your patent application.
Index
Working Model: CM: It
is sometimes necessary to send a working model of your invention to the PTO
in order to get a patent on the invention.
Fact: It is never necessary to send a working model...
Full Description
Index
Claims Most Important: CM:
In a patent application, the claims are the most important part and it is
essential to get these right; the specification need not be considered
critical, so long as it shows the general idea of the invention.
Fact: The specification is more important than the claims in a patent
application....
Full Description
Index
Unclaimed Matter In
Patent: CM: Even if your invention is shown in a prior patent,
you can get a patent on the invention so long as the prior patent does not
claim your invention.
Fact: Again this misconception represents a confusion of anticipation
with infringement...
Full Description
Index
Effective Invention: CM:
The Patent and Trademark Office will not issue a patent unless the claimed
invention works more effectively than prior inventions.
Fact: The PTO does not care how well an invention works, so long as it
appears reasonably useful...
Full Description
Index
Expired Patent: CM:
If your invention is shown in a prior patent, you can still get a patent on
the invention, provided the prior patent has expired...
Fact: There are vast differences between anticipation and
infringement...
Full Description
Index
Financier: CM: If you
want to make your financier a 50% owner of your invention, it is OK to do
this by filing the patent application in both of your names.
Fact: A US patent application must be filed in the name(s) of the
true inventor(s) only...
Full Description
Index
Rejection On Invalidatable Patent: CM:
The PTO can't reject your claims on a patent which itself was improperly
issued since it is unpatentable over an earlier patent.
Fact: Even if a prior patent is invalid, it is still a good prior-art
reference.
Index
Patent Pending: CM:
The term "patent applied for" indicates that a patent application on an
invention has been officially filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
and the term "patent pending" indicates that the patent application has been
examined and approved for patent, but has not yet been granted.
Fact: Both terms have identical meanings, legally and to everyone
connected with patents and inventions.
Full Description
Index
Renew Patent: CM: A
patent lasts for 17 years, but can be renewed once.
Fact: US patents are not and have never been renewable...
Full Description
Index
Post-Office Patent: CM:
You can protect your invention adequately by a "post-office patent", i.e.,
by mailing a description of your invention to yourself by certified mail.
Fact: The use of certified mailers is a very poor substitute for getting
live witnesses to sign a description of your invention....
Full Description
Index
Notarization: CM: One
can protect an invention by getting a description of it notarized.
Fact: Notarization is of little value since notaries merely witness
your signature. you are far better off getting witnesses who understand your
invention.
Full Description
Index
Patent Pending: CM:
Once your patent application is on file in the Patent and Trademark Office,
your "patent pending" can be used to sue or stop infringers.
Fact: A pending patent application confers no legal rights on the patent
applicant...
Full Description
Index
Inviolability Of Patent:
CM: Once you get a patent on your invention, you can use it to stop all
infringers and it can't be taken away from you or defeated.
Fact: Patents and their claims can and often are declared invalid or
unenforceable by the PTO or the courts for various reasons...
Full Description
Index
Patent = Freedom From Infringement:
CM: If the Patent Office grants one a patent, it guarantees that the
invention is free from infringement.
Fact: Patenting an item gives one offensive rights only and does not
provide any protection from infringing earlier patents.
Index
Patent As Defense: CM:
If you receive a patent on your invention, it will protect you from
infringement suits and other legal problems, allowing you to manufacture the
invention with impunity for the life of your patent.
Fact: A patent confers no rights on the inventor (or the patent owner),
other than the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling the
patented invention....
Full Description
Index
PTO Action Against Infringers:
CM: If someone infringes your patent, you can file a report with the
PTO and they will take action for you against the infringer.
Fact: The PTO is totally unconcerned with infringements...
Full Description
Index
Patent Application Infringe:
CM: If your invention is covered by the claims of a prior patent, you
will be liable as an infringer if you file a patent application on the
invention.
Fact: Neither a patent application nor its claims can infringe a
patent...
Full Description
Index
Avoid Infringement:
CM: To avoid infringing a patent, one need merely change what is shown
in its drawings slightly.
Fact: The scope of a patent is determined by the wording of its
claims, not the drawing.
Index
Infringement Of Drawing: CM:
If your product is clearly shown in the drawing of another's patent, you are
ipso facto an infringer of that patent and should immediately cease
production or obtain a license from the patent owner.
Fact: Only the claims of a patent determine infringement...
Full Description
Index
Copy Non-Patented: CM:
If you copy a device or circuit, you can be validly sued for infringement,
even if the copied device is not patented, so long as your copy is
substantially identical.
Fact: You are free to copy any device or circuit, even to the
minutest details, so long as you do not infringe any applicable patent,
trademark, or copyright.
Index
Paper Infringement: CM: If
you draw, reproduce, and sell paper copies of a manufactured circuit, you
can be validly sued by the circuit manufacturer.
Fact: While you may feel that you may be bilking the circuit
manufacturer, under the law, your action is merely a permissible form of
"reverse engineering" and is perfectly permissible since it violates no
copyright, patent, or other laws.
Index
Home Use: CM: What you
do in your own home or for your own personal use will not infringe a patent
which is otherwise applicable.
Fact: While "home infringement" may be difficult to detect, nevertheless
it is a form of infringement which is legally actionable and can subject the
infringer to paying damages and/or an injunction prohibiting further
infringement.
Index
Claimed Feature:
CM: If you get a claim allowed which includes a recitation of an element
or feature of your invention, and this claim is valid, you will always be
able to enforce this claim against anyone who sells anything with this
element or feature.
Fact: A claim must be read in its entirety; if it recites only a single
feature of your invention, then it will monopolize this feature and can be
used against infringers...
Full Description
Index
Single Element Of Claim:
CM: If you get a claim allowed which includes a recitation of an element
or feature of your invention, and this claim is valid, you will always be
able to enforce this claim against anyone who sells anything with this
element or feature.
Fact: A claim must be read in its entirety; if it recites only a
single feature of your invention, then it will monopolize this feature and
can be used against infringers, no matter how they sell anything with this
feature. However most claims recite...
Full Description
Index
Foreign Patent: CM: A
foreign patent which shows or claims your invention will prevent you from
making the invention in the US.
Fact: A patent of any country is enforceable only within the
geographical area of that country and has no effect elsewhere. Thus, for
example, a French patent is enforceable only in France and has no force or
effect in the US.
Index
Patent Marking: CM: If
a product is not marked "patented" and it does not have a patent number, you
are free to copy the product since the law requires patented products to be
marked with the legend "Patented" and the patent number.
Fact: While the law gives certain benefits to those who mark patented
products with the patent number, it does not require any form of patent
marking, so that even if it has no patent legend, a product may be covered
by an in-force patent...
Full Description
Index
DDP: CM: By filing a
Document Disclosure with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), you
will obtain a two-year grace period in which to file a patent application
without loss of rights.
Fact:The only purpose of the DDP is to provide you (for a $10 fee) with
a reliable witness...
Full Description
Index
Promoting Your Invention
Wait Till Issue: CM:
It is best to wait until your patent issues before trying to sell or license
your invention since a patent will make a favorable impression on companies
which might be interested in your invention.
Fact: While there are advantages to selling an already-patented
invention, generally it is best to try to sell or license your invention as
soon as possible after filing your patent application...
Full Description
Index
Success: CM: If you
can get a patent, it will make you rich and famous.
Fact: Only a few percent of patentees make money from their
inventions. This is probably due to lack of investigation for commercial
potential before filing and inadequate promotion after filing.
Index
Better Invention: CM: If you
come up with a better way of doing something, the marketplace will chase
after you and make you rich.
Fact: Even the greatest invention needs to be promoted intensively in
order to succeed.
Index
Co. Will Want: CM: If
you can get a patent, many companies will want and compete for it.
Fact: Companiesare too busy to look for you and your invention. You
have to seek out suitable companies and really sell it to profit from your
invention.
Index
Company Keep Confidential:
CM: If you have an invention which you think would be of interest to a
large company, you can send a description of the invention to the company
under an agreement by which the company will (a) pay you if it uses the
invention, and (b) keep it confidential during and after the time it decides
what to do with the invention.
Fact: Almost no large company will agree to these terms...
Full Description
Index
Big Cos. Steal: CM: Most big
cos. Will steal an invention and will not be fair to an inventor.
Fact: By and large most companies are honest. There are exceptions
though, so an inventor should always be careful.
Index
More Detailed
Descriptions
Risk of Loosing your
Invention
Patent Examiners Steal:
CM: Patent examiners in the PTO are on the lookout for good
inventions to steal for their own use.
Fact: By law, patent examiners are not allowed to own any part of a
patent application; thus they would not be able to copy any invention for
their own benefit. While theoretically it would be possible for an examiner
to tell a friend or relative about a valuable pending invention, in practice
I have never heard of this. Also the owner of the patent application, having
already filed an application, would have much stronger rights than a
newcomer. Further, every patent examiner sees hundreds of new patent
applications every year, and while some may look like very promising
innovations, experience has taught them that many apparently-valuable paper
inventions do not prove out in practice due to unforseen difficulties.
Lastly (see above) it is a crime (perjury) to sign a patent application if
you are not the true inventor.
Index
Patent
Applications Open: CM: There is a danger in filing a
patent application in the PTO since others can come in, see, copy, or steal
your invention.
Fact: By law, the PTO must preserve patent applications in secrecy and
in practice is very strict in this regard. Outsiders have no access to any
pending patent applications.
Index
Buy-up By Companies:
CM: Often large companies buy valuable inventions, such as the
100,000-mile tire and the 100-mpg carburetor, at a pittance by defrauding
the inventor or so that they can continue to make enormous profits from
their inefficient or obsolescent products.
Fact: I have never heard of any successful instance of this and there
are valid reasons why it would not occur. First, almost every inventor knows
the full value of his or her invention and is unlikely to sell it for far
less than it is worth. Most inventions are licensed, rather than sold, so
that the inventor will share in any success the invention enjoys. Second, if
an inventor were somehow to be persuaded to sell an invention at a pittance,
and later sees that his or her corporate buyer is marketing it and making
enormous profits, a lawsuit against the company is almost certain to occur;
juries in such cases are extremely sympathetic to the defrauded inventor, as
was the jury in the !1- !0case, which involved the quick-release socket
wrench. Third, and most important, cream always rises to the top: a good
invention can't be supressed or hidden for very long since there are
thousands of creative people out there seeking the solution to almost every
problem under the sun, including the problem solved by the instant
invention.
Index
Old Date Of Conception:
CM: If you invented something twenty years ago, but kept it quiet and
didn't get around to filing a patent application yet, and you see that
someone else has recently received a patent on the same invention, you can
still protect your rights if you can prove your earlier date of invention.
Fact: In patent law, the diligent are rewarded and procrastinators tend
to lose out. Although you were first, your long delay and the intervening
patenting of the invention by another will defeat your rights. In fact, you
can even be sued for manufacturing your own invention (if you're not
diligent in patenting it) by a later, diligent inventor who got a patent
while you were dallying.
Index
Getting A Patent
Everything
Invented: CM: It is more difficult to get a patent now because
most of the good ideas have already been invented.
Fact: The Commissioner of patents in 1898 was reported to have made this
same statement. After that came television, airplanes, cars, computers,
biotechnology, space travel, radio, etc. As Oprah said, "The future is so
bright, it blinds my eyes".
Index
Transfer
Inventorship: CM: If your father (or another relative)
invented something, but didn't do anything with it, he can transfer his
rights as an inventor to you and you can apply for a patent on the invention
in your name.
Fact: As stated in #1. above, only the true inventor can legally apply
for the patent; if you want to obtain another's rights, they must be
assigned from the inventor (or the inventor's estate if the inventor is
deceased) to you. However the true inventor (or his or her executor or
administrator if he is deceased) must still sign the patent application.
Index
Not In Use:
CM: If you have made an invention which neither you, nor any expert
or executive in its field, has ever heard of, you can be fairly sure that it
is patentable.
Fact: It has been the experience of most patent professionals that
"experts" in any field are usually aware of only a small fraction of the
"prior art" in that field and that prior patents usually contain many times
more references than popular knowledge in the field.
Index
Patent
Best: CM: A patent is the best way to monopolize an invention:
Fact: Trade secret may sometimes be a better way of monopolizing your
invention.
Index
Known Invention:
CM: If an invention has been publicly known, but has never been
patented, it's "up for grabs" so that anyone who discovers it can now patent
it.
Fact: According to the law, a patent can be awarded only to the first
person(s) to actually invent a new invention. If an invention has
been publicly known before, either in a prior publication (including a
patent) or by previous manufacture, it is considered "prior art" and can no
longer be patented by anyone. If un-patented old things could now be
patented, I would have rushed out and patented the wheel years ago.
Index
Copy Foreign Invention:
CM: One can copy a foreign invention and patent it in the US.
Fact: One must be the actual inventor to apply for a patent. Also,
once something is patented aborad, it is too late to patent it in the US.
Index
Patentability If No
Inf: CM: If manufacture of your
invention will not infringe any prior patent, you can get a patent on the
invention.
Fact: Again a confusing of anticipation and infringement--infringement
considerations are irrelevant in determining patentability.
Index
Foreign
Patents: CM: Foreign patents and publications cannot block
your patent application, even if they show your invention.
Fact: Prior publication, from anywhere in the world, is valid prior art
against your patent application.
Index
Working Model:
CM: It is sometimes necessary to send a working model of your
invention to the PTO in order to get a patent on the invention.
Fact: It is never necessary to send a working model unless the PTO
questions the operability of the invention (very rare). However many patent
attorneys sometimes find it very useful to send such a working model in
order to help convince the patent examiner of the value and credibility of
the invention and the patent application.
Index
Claims Most Important:
CM: In a patent application, the claims are the most important part
and it is essential to get these right; the specification need not be
considered critical, so long as it shows the general idea of the invention.
Fact: The specification is more important than the claims in a patent
application since an inadequate specification can't be augmented due to the
PTO's strict proscription against adding any "new matter" to a patent
application. However, unless the application is allowed on the first Office
Action (rare), the claims can be amended freely.
Index
Unclaimed
Matter In Patent: CM: Even if your invention is
shown in a prior patent, you can get a patent on the invention so long as
the prior patent does not claim your invention.
Fact: Again this misconception represents a confusion of anticipation
with infringement. For the purposes of determining patentability of your
invention, you should treat a prior patent just like any other publication,
such as a magazine article, textbook, or even an old comic strip. If the
wrist-watch radio shown in old Dick Tracy comics could be used by the Patent
and Trademark Office to reject patent applications, so could old patents
which may have shown but did not claim the wrist-satch radio. This is
because a prior patent (or any other publication) which shows your invention
proves that you are not the first inventor and therefore you cannot get a
patent on the invention. While the claims of the prior patent are essential
in determining infringement, they are totally irrelevant for purposes of
anticipation and generally should not even be read when you make a
patentability search.
Index
Effective Invention:
CM: The Patent and Trademark Office will not issue a patent unless
the claimed invention works more effectively than prior inventions.
Fact: The PTO does not care how well an invention works, so long as it
appears reasonably useful. The main criterion in the PTO is whether an
invention is sufficiently different from ("unobvious over") the prior art;
it does not have to work better than the prior art.
Index
Expired
Patent: CM: If your invention is shown in a prior patent, you
can still get a patent on the invention, provided the prior patent has
expired. Stated differently, if you are making a patent search, you need
merely search back only 17 years to cover only in-force patents since
earlier-issued, expired patents will not block your invention.
Fact: There are vast differences between anticipation and infringement,
yet these two subjects are probably the most common source of confusion
among laypersons. An anticipation is an earlier reference (i.e., · prior
publication, such as a patent (in-force or expired), textbook, magazine
article, etc.) which shows that the invention was publically known before
the filing date of the patent application. The anticipation, by effectively
showing that the invention was not original with the the present inventor,
will cause the patent application to be rejected or the patent to be
invalidated. An infringement, on the other hand, is something which one
makes, uses, or sells which falls within the wording of the claims of an
in-force patent, i.e, a patent which has issued with the last 17 years. A
device which incorporates an improvement invention can infringe an in-force
patent even though a patent application on the improvement invention may not
be anticipated by the in-force patent. Thus Fleming's diode patent was
infringed by de Forrest's triode, yet de Forrest's triode was patentable
over the diode.
Index
Financier:
CM: If you want to make your financier a 50% owner of your invention,
it is OK to do this by filing the patent application in both of your names.
Fact: A US patent application must be filed in the name(s) of the
true inventor(s) only; if any non-inventors are named as inventors, this
will subject the patent application to being stricken and can invalidate the
patent if the Patent and Trademark Office, a court, or any adversary you
encounter discovers the truth. Moreover any non-inventor (or inventor) who
signs a patent application knowing non-inventors are named as inventors
would be committing perjury since a patent application is made under oath
stating that the persons who have signed are the true inventors. There are
several legitimate ways to convey an interest in your invention to a
non-inventor: you can assign (legally transfer) a percentage of your
invention directly to the non-inventor, you can form a partnership or
corporation (or other legal entity) and assign your whole invention to the
entity in return for an interest in the entity, or you can use a licensing
or joint venture arrangement to convey the desired interest.
Index
Rejection
On Invalidatable Patent: CM: The PTO
can't reject your claims on a patent which itself was improperly issued
since it is unpatentable over an earlier patent.
Fact: Even if a prior patent is invalid, it is still a good prior-art
reference.
Index
Patent Pending:
CM: The term "patent applied for" indicates that a patent application
on an invention has been officially filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office and the term "patent pending" indicates that the patent application
has been examined and approved for patent, but has not yet been granted.
Fact: Both terms have identical meanings, legally and to everyone
connected with patents and inventions. Specifically both mean that a patent
application on the invention has been officially filed in the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office, but has not yet been granted or officially abandoned;
the term gives no indication whatever about the status of the patent
application or whether it is likely to be patented. It is a criminal offense
to use the words "patent applied for" or "patent pending" in any advertising
when there is no active patent application on file.
Index
Renew Patent:
CM: A patent lasts for 17 years, but can be renewed once.
Fact: US patents are not and have never been renewable. (After WWII,
special legislation was passed to extend the term of certain patents owned
by soldiers, but this was an isolated case. Also, under legislation passed
in 1982, all patents are granted for 17 years, but will lapse sooner (after
4, 8, or 12 years) if respective maintenance fees are not paid at least six
months before the respective lapse dates. Finally, the terms of drug patents
can be extended if part of the patent term was lost due to an FDA regulatory
action.
Index
Post-Office Patent:
CM: You can protect your invention adequately by a "post-office
patent", i.e., by mailing a description of your invention to yourself by
certified mail.
Fact: The use of certified mailers is a very poor substitute for getting
live witnesses to sign a description of your invention or even for the PTO's
Document Disclosure Program. This is because the courts and the PTO, when
called upon to decide a date of invention in a dispute or situation where
the date or inventorship is critical, much prefer the testimony or
affidavits of live witnesses, who have actually seen and understood the
invention, and are available for cross-examination, than some marks left by
a rubber stamp on a paper with no live witnesses, other than the inventor
(who has a strong self-serving interest).
Index
Notarization:
CM: One can protect an invention by getting a description of it
notarized.
Fact: Notarization is of little value since notaries merely witness
your signature. you are far better off getting witnesses who understand your
invention.
Index
Rights that Patents
give
Patent Pending:
CM: Once your patent application is on file in the Patent and
Trademark Office, your "patent pending" can be used to sue or stop
infringers.
Fact: A pending patent application confers no legal rights on the patent
applicant; it is only when the patent issues that the patent owner is
empowered to sue infringers. The "Patent pending" legend is legally without
any effect; it is used by patent applicants merely to warn potential copiers
that they do so at risk of future liability, starting only when the patent
issues.
Index
Inviolability Of
Patent: CM: Once you get a
patent on your invention, you can use it to stop all infringers and it can't
be taken away from you or defeated.
Fact: Patents and their claims can and often are declared invalid or
unenforceable by the PTO or the courts for various reasons, such as relevant
prior art which was not previously uncovered, public use or sale of the
invention prior to the filing date of the patent application, misuse of the
patent by its owner, e.g., by committing antitrust violations, and fraud on
the PTO committed by the inventor, e.g., by failing to reveal relevant facts
about the invention and the prior art. Also, patents which appear to be
infringed may be found not infringed when a careful study is made of the
patent and the suspected infringing device.
Index
Patent =
Freedom From Infringement: CM: If the
Patent Office grants one a patent, it guarantees that the invention is free
from infringement.
Fact: Patenting an item gives one offensive rights only and does not
provide any protection from infringing earlier patents.
Index
Patent As Defense:
CM: If you receive a patent on your invention, it will protect you
from infringement suits and other legal problems, allowing you to
manufacture the invention with impunity for the life of your patent.
Fact: A patent confers no rights on the inventor (or the patent owner),
other than the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling the
patented invention. As indicated above, if you get a patent on an
improvement invention, the owner of a patent on the basic invention can
validly sue you for infringement if you make the improvement invention.
Also, a patent owner has to be wary of the antitrust laws, product safety
laws, ecological laws, etc.
Index
PTO Action
Against Infringers: CM: If
someone infringes your patent, you can file a report with the PTO and they
will take action for you against the infringer.
Fact: The PTO is totally unconcerned with infringements; the patent
owner has the full burden of proving and recovering for infringement by
suing the infringer in Federal Court where the infringer resides or has
committed infringement. Patent infringement suits are extremely expensive,
usually running well over $100,000, so the party with the deeper pocket
usually has the advantage. However recent legislation enables some economies
in patent litigation to be effected by enabling patent validity questions to
be arbitrated or referred back to the PTO for determination.
Index
Avoid
Infringement: CM: To avoid infringing a patent, one need
merely change what is shown in its drawings slightly.
Fact: The scope of a patent is determined by the wording of its
claims, not the drawing
Index
Infringement Of
Drawing: CM: If your product is clearly
shown in the drawing of another's patent, you are ipso facto an infringer of
that patent and should immediately cease production or obtain a license from
the patent owner.
Fact: Only the claims of a patent determine infringement. The claims are
legalistic sentence fragments at the end of a patent which describe the
specific invention which the patent protects. Often the claims define an
invention which is much narrower than what is shown in the patent's
drawings, so you may not have any liability even if your product is shown in
the patent's drawings.
Index
Copy Non-Patented:
CM: If you copy a device or circuit, you can be validly sued for
infringement, even if the copied device is not patented, so long as your
copy is substantially identical.
Fact: You are free to copy any device or circuit, even to the
minutest details, so long as you do not infringe any applicable patent,
trademark, or copyright.
Index
Paper Infringement:
CM: If you draw, reproduce, and sell paper copies of a manufactured
circuit, you can be validly sued by the circuit manufacturer.
Fact: While you may feel that you may be bilking the circuit
manufacturer, under the law, your action is merely a permissible form of
"reverse engineering" and is perfectly permissible since it violates no
copyright, patent, or other laws.
Index
Home Use:
CM: What you do in your own home or for your own personal use will
not infringe a patent which is otherwise applicable.
Fact: While "home infringement" may be difficult to detect, nevertheless
it is a form of infringement which is legally actionable and can subject the
infringer to paying damages and/or an injunction prohibiting further
infringement.
Index
Claimed
Feature: CM: If you get a claim allowed which includes a
recitation of an element or feature of your invention, and this claim is
valid, you will always be able to enforce this claim against anyone who
sells anything with this element or feature.
Fact: A claim must be read in its entirety; if it recites only a single
feature of your invention, then it will monopolize this feature and can be
used against infringers, no matter how they sell anything with this feature.
However most claims recite many elements or features , and thus protect only
the of these elements or features, and not any single one of the elements or
features per se. Even if a dependent claim (i.e., a claim which refers back
to a preceeding claim) recites only a single feature or element of the
invention, it will not protect this feature per se since it must be read to
include all of the features of the preceeding (independent) claim to which
it refers.
Index
Single Element Of
Claim: CM: If you get a claim
allowed which includes a recitation of an element or feature of your
invention, and this claim is valid, you will always be able to enforce this
claim against anyone who sells anything with this element or feature.
Fact: A claim must be read in its entirety; if it recites only a
single feature of your invention, then it will monopolize this feature and
can be used against infringers, no matter how they sell anything with this
feature. However most claims recite many elements or features ÈÓ „ÔÌ‚ÈÓ·ÙÈÔÓ,
and thus protect only the „ÔÌ‚ÈÓ·ÙÈÔÓ of these elements or features, and not
any single one of the elements or features per se. Even if a dependent claim
(i.e., a claim which refers back to a preceeding claim) recites only a
single feature or element of the invention, it will not protect this feature
per se since it must be read to include all of the features of the
proceeding (independent) claim to which it refers.
Index
Foreign Patent:
CM: A foreign patent which shows or claims your invention will
prevent you from making the invention in the US.
Fact: A patent of any country is enforceable only within the
geographical area of that country and has no effect elsewhere. Thus, for
example, a French patent is enforceable only in France and has no force or
effect in the US.
Index
Patent Marking:
CM: If a product is not marked "patented" and it does not have a
patent number, you are free to copy the product since the law requires
patented products to be marked with the legend "Patented" and the patent
number.
Fact: While the law gives certain benefits to those who mark patented
products with the patent number, it does not require any form of patent
marking, so that even if it has no patent legend, a product may be covered
by an in-force patent. Thus you should make a patent search or inquire of
the manufacturer before copying if you feel a patent could be applicable.
Index
DDP:
CM: By filing a Document Disclosure with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (PTO), you will obtain a two-year grace period in which to
file a patent application without loss of rights.
Fact: I have never seen a lay inventor who was not confused about the
PTO's Document Disclosure Program (DDP). The only purpose of the DDP is to
provide you (for a $10 fee) with a reliable witness (the PTO itself) to your
conception of the invention; this may prove useful if you ever get into an
invention dispute (interference) or want to "swear behind" a cited
reference. The DDP provides no grace period, preserves no rights, and has no
effect on your patent application. The same results can be obtained for free
by getting two reliable persons to sign that they have "Witnessed and
Understood" your invention. In fact, using live witnesses is far better in
most cases since live witnesses can testify that they have seen that your
invention was built and tested successfully, a very important bit of proof
in invention disputes.
Index
Promoting Your
Invention
Wait Till Issue:
CM: It is best to wait until your patent issues before trying to sell
or license your invention since a patent will make a favorable impression on
companies which might be interested in your invention.
Fact: While there are advantages to selling an already-patented
invention, generally it is best to try to sell or license your invention as
soon as possible after filing your patent application. This is because
prospective corporate purchasers of your invention will want to get a "head
start" on the competition by tooling up and hitting the market before the
invention is made public by the issuance of a patent. Also since it usually
takes a year or two to tool up and get a product on the market, a year or
two of the 17-year patent monopoly will be wasted if tooling is not started
until after the patent issues. The prestige of a patent can be compensated
for by a favorable search report opinion from a patent attorney stating that
the invention is likely to be awarded a patent.
Index
Success:
CM: If you can get a patent, it will make you rich and famous.
Fact: Only a few percent of patentees make money from their
inventions. This is probably due to lack of investigation for commercial
potential before filing and inadequate promotion after filing.
Index
Better Invention:
CM: If you come up with a better way of doing something, the marketplace
will chase after you and make you rich.
Fact: Even the greatest invention needs to be promoted intensively in
order to succeed.
Index
Co. Will Want:
CM: If you can get a patent, many companies will want and compete for
it.
Fact: Companiesare too busy to look for you and your invention. You
have to seek out suitable companies and really sell it to profit from your
invention.
Index
Company Keep
Confidential: CM: If you have an
invention which you think would be of interest to a large company, you can
send a description of the invention to the company under an agreement by
which the company will (a) pay you if it uses the invention, and (b) keep it
confidential during and after the time it decides what to do with the
invention.
Fact: Almost no large company will agree to these terms; rather,
before even looking at your invention, they will require you to sign
agreement (called a waiver form), under which you must agree that (1) the
company has no obligation of confidentiality to you, and (2) the company is
not bound to pay you anything, even if they use your invention, unless their
use of infringes a patent which you own. Most companies use the waiver form
on the advice of their attorneys because they have been burned by suits from
inventors claiming violation of a confidentiality agreement or an implied
agreement to pay if the invention is used, even though the company's own
inventor may have come up with the invention independently of the outside
inventor.
Index
Big Cos. Steal:
CM: Most big cos. Will steal an invention and will not be fair to an
inventor.
Fact: By and large most companies are honest. There are exceptions
though, so an inventor should always be careful.
Index
Copyright (c)
2001 David Pressman |